{"id":273,"date":"2009-12-17T15:20:42","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T14:20:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/?p=273"},"modified":"2010-03-04T10:56:31","modified_gmt":"2010-03-04T09:56:31","slug":"learn-to-play-the-guitar-in-two-weeks-day-5","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/2009\/12\/learn-to-play-the-guitar-in-two-weeks-day-5\/","title":{"rendered":"Learn to Play the Guitar in Two Weeks, Day 5: All Strings Are Not Created Equal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s been said about guitar playing that <strong>the left hand is the craftsman, but the right hand is the <em>artist<\/em><\/strong>. I first read that when I was a kid, struggling with some classical guitar etudes or whatever, and I thought it was a great quote &#8212; only whoever said it must have gotten the hands mixed up. Surely, the <em>left<\/em> hand must be the artist?<\/p>\n<p>But no: even though most of the rehearsal time &#8212; at least as a classical guitarist &#8212; is spent on figuring out fingerings and practicing transitions between chords, that&#8217;s &#8220;just&#8221; craftsmanship. It&#8217;s the right hand that makes the <em>music<\/em>. <em>Rhythm<\/em>, as we discussed yesterday, is of course the main right-hand task. But also the <em>sound quality<\/em> in general &#8212; do you strike hard or soft, close to the bridge or to the sound hole, upwards or downwards, with thumb or fingernails, or with a plectrum? All these things that determine what kind of sound you make.<\/p>\n<p>But also in the areas of <em>melody<\/em> and <em>harmony<\/em>, the right hand has a huge task. This is of course a shared area between the two hands, but the ability to pick out a melody or a certain harmonic progression is first and foremost a right-hand technique. This is going to be the main topic today.<\/p>\n<h3>All Strings are Not Created Equal<\/h3>\n<p>In the beginning &#8212; as far as I remember it &#8212; one is probably mostly concerned with placing the left-hand fingers in the right spot and trying to disregard the pain in the fingertips. The right hand does a rather crude job, mostly striking all the strings every time, or &#8212; perhaps &#8212; trying to avoid hitting the wrong strings.<\/p>\n<p>The first step towards releasing the artistic potential of the right hand, is to realise that All Strings Are Not Created Equal. The guitar can do a pretty good job at filling in for the members of a full band: The three high strings &#8212; roughly speaking &#8212; provide harmony and play the part of the organ or the backup singers; the low ones are bass strings and do what the bass guitar does (and the right hand in general &#8212; with some help from the left hand &#8212; is the drum kit; the only instrument that is missing, is the solo guitar, which the guitar cannot mimick, unless you are very advanced, like Richard Thompson, e.g.).<\/p>\n<p>In order to bring out these different roles &#8212; and this is something you <em>should<\/em> strive towards &#8212; you need to be able to treat the strings separately.This means: to be able to<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>strike only the bass strings or only the treble strings; and\/or<\/li>\n<li>strike a single string at the time.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Compare these two examples:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  v   v   v     v   v ^ v     v\r\n  G                           C\r\n  :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .\r\n|-3---3---3---|-3---3-3-3---|-0---\r\n|-0---0---0---|-0---0-0-0---|-1---\r\n|-0---0---0---|-0---0-0-0---|-0---  etc.\r\n|-0---0---0---|-0---0-0-0---|-2---\r\n|-2---2---2---|-2---2-2-2---|-3---\r\n|-3---3---3---|-3---3-3-3---|-----<\/pre>\n<p>and<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .\r\n|-----3---3---|-----3-3-3---|-0---\r\n|-----0---0---|-----0-0-0---|-1---\r\n|-----0---0---|-----0-0-0---|-0---  etc.\r\n|-0-----------|-0-----------|-2---\r\n|-2-----------|-2-----------|-3---\r\n|-3-----------|-------------|-----<\/pre>\n<p>The exact strings are not important, but the general idea is: what you\u2019re doing here is both adding some air (so that the music can breathe), and providing lines. Already in this little example, you are playing a bass line and bringing out more clearly at least a fragment of two other melody lines.<\/p>\n<p>The most obvious line is the bass line:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .\r\n|-------------|-------------|-----\r\n|-------------|-------------|-----\r\n|-------------|-------------|-----\r\n|-------------|-------------|-----\r\n|-------------|-2-----------|-3---\r\n|-3-----------|-------------|-----<\/pre>\n<p>But also on the two upper strings there are melody lines that stand out more clearly, now that they are allowed to sound alone, without the mass of strings on their back.<\/p>\n<p>This is the kind of lines that you should try your best to bring out in your playing. The good thing is that it will happen more or less automatically if you make a habit of varying your stroke. As a rule of thumb, the bass strings belong to the accented beats (the first beat in triple time, as in the example above; the first and third in 4\/4), the treble strings to the unaccented.<\/p>\n<p>(<em>I realize I haven\u2019t said anything about time signatures and such yet. I will add a section about that to the Day 4 lesson.)<\/em><\/p>\n<h3>Slash chords<\/h3>\n<p>Also, in a good chord file, the bass line will be written out for you.  This is done with <em>slash chords<\/em>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A slash chord indicates, in addition to the chord itself, the bass tone to be played. This is added to the chord symbol, separated with a slash. E.g. &#8220;G\/b&#8221;, which means: G major, with <tt>b<\/tt> as the bass string.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In an ordinary chord symbol, such as &#8220;G&#8221;, it is implied that the bass note &#8212; the deepest sounding  note &#8212; is also <tt>g<\/tt>. So although the G chord contains all three bass strings, the one that plays <tt>g<\/tt> is the most important one. This happens to be the sixth string &#8212;<\/p>\n<p>(<em>I realize I haven\u2019t presented you with the whole scale and the positions of the tones on the fretboard yet. I&#8217;ve just added a section about that to the Day 4 lesson, which you may want to revisit.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8212; so in the case of G, there isn\u2019t much of a problem there: strike all the chords, and the lowest note will automatically be the bass note.  Gee, it&#8217;s a great chord\u2026 But remember our hate chord, D? One of the reasons it\u2019s such a despicable chord is that there are two strings &#8212; a third of your whole resource base &#8212; that  you\u2019re not supposed to use. In shorthand: xx0232.<\/p>\n<p>Time to modify that statement a little. The sixth string is an E, which is definitely not part of a D chord, so that string is forever out of the picture &#8212; it will sound <em>bad<\/em> if you even <em>touch<\/em> it while playing a D chord. Don\u2019t say I didn\u2019t warn you.<\/p>\n<p>But the fifth string is different. It\u2019s an A, and the tone A is actually part of the D major chord. It\u2019s there already: the tone on the third string should be an a.<\/p>\n<p>So why is it forbidden, &#8220;x&#8221;ed  out in the shorthand? Because it is not the proper bass string. The fundament of a chord should be its proper bass tone, and so there is nothing else to do than to leave out two of the swetest strings you have. Shit happens.<\/p>\n<p>But slash chords can change that. There are circumstances where you want the bass tone to be something other than the chord\u2019s proper bass tone. You could for example play an alternating bass pattern:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  D       D\/a       D       D\/a\r\n  :   .   .   .     :   .   .   .\r\n|-----2-------2---|-----2-------2---|\r\n|-----3-------3---|-----3-------3---|\r\n|-----2-------2---|-----2-------2---|\r\n|-0---------------|-0---------------|\r\n|---------0-------|---------0-------|\r\n|-----------------|-----------------|<\/pre>\n<p>or, as in the earlier examples, bring out a certain bass line. The example that we started with could be written:<\/p>\n<pre>G    G\/b    C<\/pre>\n<p>This is sometimes abbreviated to<\/p>\n<pre>G    \/b    C<\/pre>\n<p>I will usually use the latter form if the chord itself is not really that important &#8212; what counts is the bass tone, as part of a bass line.<\/p>\n<p>Both these forms of notation are confusing to some, but as you can see, it\u2019s simple enough: the slash part of the chord is extra information that you can use to bring out a certain effect. Since it&#8217;s &#8220;extra information&#8221;, you are free to leave it out.<\/p>\n<h3>Blowin\u2019 in the Wind Revisited<\/h3>\n<p>If you have been with me from the start and have played &#8220;Blowin\u2019 in the Wind&#8221; in the version from Day 2, you may have noticed that even though it sounds more or less as the album version (at least it should), it\u2019s still not quite the same. And if you\u2019ve checked <a href=\"http:\/\/dylanchords.info\/02_freewheelin\/blowin_in_the_wind.htm\">some tab site\u2019s version<\/a>, you may have seen that it\u2019s not written in D at all.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s because Dylan plays it with a capo, all the way up at the seventh fret, and because he uses a lot of slash chords. The capo position means that he plays with chords shapes from the G major family but the sounds that come out of it are in  D major.<\/p>\n<p>If you followed the day 1 instructions and bought a capo, this is the time to put it on. If not, either run down there and get one right now, or play it without a capo, in which case it will not sound exactly as on the record (but it probably never will &#8212; no offense &#8212; so it may not matter that much\u00a0\u2026):<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">G        C     \/b     D\/a      G\r\nHow many roads must a man walk down\r\nG          C    \/b    G\r\nBefore you call him a man?\r\n         G        C    \/b     D\/a        G\r\nYes, 'n' how many seas must a white dove sail\r\nG          C      \/b     D\r\nBefore she sleeps in the sand?\r\n         G        C     \/b       D\/a          G\r\nYes, 'n' how many times must the cannon balls fly\r\n  G            C  \/b   G\r\nBefore they're forever banned?\r\n    C   \/b     D\/a        G              C\r\nThe answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind,\r\n    C   \/b    D\/a            G\r\nThe answer is blowin' in the wind.<\/pre>\n<p>You already have all the tools you need to play this, but since I\u2019m a nice guy, I\u2019ll summarize:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><tt>\/b<\/tt> means &#8220;play the bass tone <tt>b<\/tt> (regardless of the chord you\u2019re otherwise playing). In this case, this means the second fret of the fifth string: <tt>-2----<\/tt>.<\/li>\n<li><tt>D\/a<\/tt> is a D chord with A (the open fifth string) replacing d as the bass string.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you use the default bass string for the rest of the chords, and otherwise try to apply the variation between bass and treble strings, you may end up with something like this:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  G                 C       \/b\r\n  :   .   .   .     :   .   .   .\r\n|-----3---3-3-3-3-|-----0-------0---|\r\n|-----0---0-0-0-0-|-----1-------1---|\r\n|-----0---0-0-0-0-|-----0-------0---|\r\n|-----------------|-----------------|\r\n|-----------------|-3-------2-------|\r\n|-3---------------|-----------------|\r\n\r\n  D\/a               G\r\n  :   .   .   .     :   .   .   .\r\n|-----2-2-2---2---|-----3-3-3---3---|\r\n|-----3-3-3---3---|-----0-0-0---0---|\r\n|-----2-2-2---2---|-----0-0-0---0---|\r\n|-----------------|-----------------|\r\n|-0---------------|-----------------|\r\n|-----------------|-3---------------|\r\n\r\n  G                 C       \/b\r\n  :   .   .   .     :   .   .   .\r\n|-----3---3-3-3-3-|-----0-------0---|\r\n|-----0---0-0-0-0-|-----1-------1---|\r\n|-----0---0-0-0-0-|-----0-------0---|\r\n|-----------------|-----------------|\r\n|-----------------|-3-------2-------|\r\n|-3---------------|-----------------|\r\n\r\n  G\r\n  :   .   .   .\r\n|-----3-3-3---3---|\r\n|-----0-0-0---0---|\r\n|-----0-0-0---0---|\r\n|-----------------|\r\n|-----------------|\r\n|-3---------------|<\/pre>\n<p>The exact strings you play in the treble section is not important &#8212; should you strike some bass chords, that\u2019s just fine &#8212; and the rhythms I\u2019ve written in are just the ones I happened to play this one time. The important thing is the bass notes and the variation. With this in mind (and in hand) you should be able to play the rest of the song, which is just variations on the same patterns as above.<\/p>\n<h3>The Times They Are A-Changin\u2019<\/h3>\n<p>Ready for another old gem.<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">     G             Em\r\nCome gather 'round people\r\n    C        G\r\nWherever you roam\r\n      G            Em\r\nAnd admit that the waters\r\n C              D\r\nAround you have grown\r\n      G            Em\r\nAnd accept it that soon\r\n          C               G\r\nYou'll be drenched to the bone.\r\n        G       Am           D\r\nIf your time to you Is worth savin'\r\n         D            D\/c\r\nThen you better start swimmin'\r\n          G\/b         D\/a\r\nOr you'll sink like a stone\r\n        G     C          D   G . .\r\nFor the times they are a-changin'.<\/pre>\n<p>Some initial comments:<\/p>\n<p>Em is a new chord. It\u2019s quite simple: <tt>022000<\/tt>.<\/p>\n<p>In this song, Dylan plays G with the shape 320033 instead of 320003.  It\u2019s a subtle difference, which you are free to disregard, but it\u2019s like that for a reason (and this is in fact yet another example of Dylan\u2019s mastery in achieving effects with a minimum of effort): The tone on the second string in the regular chord is <tt>b<\/tt>, which is the tone that defines the chord as a major chord.  By replacing that with the d&#8217; on the third fret, the chord is almost released from that whole field of tension, and takes on a solemn character, a little like a tolling bell &#8212; quite befitting the theme of the song. All that, with just one finger\u2026<\/p>\n<p>As I said: you are not required to use the <tt>320033<\/tt> shape. It does involve all four fingers, and that may be too much to keep track of at this point. Although \u2026 some people actually find it easier to play than the standard <tt>320003<\/tt>, because the two pathetic little weaklings, the ring and little fingers, can support each other. Try it, and go with what suits you best.<\/p>\n<p>The ending is the greatness of this song (which incidentally was the first Dylan song I heard, although not with Dylan himself. I\u2019ve written an emotional account of this first meeting in the introduction to <a href=\"http:\/\/dylanchords.info\/professors\/tt\/ttch11.html\">The Uneven Heart<\/a>.). Again, it\u2019s the use of slash chords and bass lines that makes the difference.<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;better start swimmin\u2019&#8221; lines could go something like this:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  D             D\/c           G\/b           D\/a\r\n  :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .   .\r\n|-----2---2---|-----0-0-0---|-----0---0---|-----2---2---|\r\n|-----3---3---|-----3-3-3---|-----3---3---|-----3---3---|\r\n|-----2---2---|-----2-2-2---|-----0---0---|-----2---2---|\r\n|-0-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-------------|-3-----------|-2-----------|-0-----------|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n  Better start swimming or y\u2019ll sink like a stone<\/pre>\n<p>But here, you may have several objections:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;Hey! That thing in the second measure &#8212; that\u2019s not a D chord!&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;Hey! That thing in the third measure &#8212; that\u2019s not a G chord!&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>&#8220;You said I could leave out the slash thing, but if I do, the second measure doesn\u2019t sound right!&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>And you\u2019re right. But if you would just calm down a little, bridle your righteous anger over lying bastards who pose as guitar teachers etc., I\u2019ll explain.<\/p>\n<p>[ten seconds\u2019 break to calm down]<\/p>\n<p>There. Ok.<\/p>\n<p>It all has to do with what is important and what is not. That section of the song could be seen as basically just a descending bass line over a sustained note: the single note that the melody has at this point, which incidentally is what you have on the third fret of the second string. So, stripped down to the essentials, the passage could be played:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  D             D\/c           G\/b           D\/a\r\n  :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .   .\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-----3---3---|-----3---3---|-----3---3---|-----3---3---|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-0-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-------------|-3-----------|-2-----------|-0-----------|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n  Better start swimming or y\u2019ll sink like a stone<\/pre>\n<p>and nothing inalienable has been lost, really. Hence, we may consider the rest as ornament, filler.  This is not to say that the filler is unneccessary, only that it can be dealt with somewhat freely, if other considerations are of greater weight.<\/p>\n<p>Such as: ease of playing. If you were to play the <tt>D\/c<\/tt> chord without <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">cheating<\/span> making it easy for yourself, you would have to use the little finger on the second string and the third finger for the <tt>c<\/tt> on the fifth string.  That <em>is<\/em> playable, but here it is unneccessary. Much easier to move the stronger longfinger from the first to the fifth string:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">xx0        x\r\n======     ======\r\n||||||     ||||||\r\n------     ------\r\n|||1|2     |||1||\r\n------ -&gt;  ------\r\n||||3|     |2||3|\r\n------     ------\r\n||||||     ||||||<\/pre>\n<p>Note that I haven\u2019t banned  any of the open strings other than the sixth in the chord diagram; the fourth string has a <tt>d<\/tt> which can\u2019t be all wrong, since it\u2019s the keynote of the chord; and the first string &#8212; well, it\u2019s filler. It\u2019s a &#8220;wrong&#8221; tone, but in this case, hey, it doesn\u2019t matter.<\/p>\n<p>It can actually be defended not just out of <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">laziness<\/span> economizing, but as an element in an interesting melodic line. With the open e string in the second measure, what you\u2019re playing is:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  D             D\/c           G\/b           D\/a\r\n  :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .   .     :   .   .\r\n|-2-----------|-0-----------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-3-----------|-------------|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|\r\n  Better start swimming or y\u2019ll sink like a stone<\/pre>\n<p>Which works well as a a countermelody to the otherwise static melody line, and which is also parallel to the bass line.<\/p>\n<p>Much of the same could be said about your second objection. Again: the important thing is the <tt>-2--3-<\/tt> skeleton &#8212; the rest is filler.<\/p>\n<p>Note that you use the version with the third fret on the second string here, no matter what you do elsewhere in the song. This has to do both with flexibility (not being limited to one chord shape only) and economy (why use the other shape, when that finger is already in place?). It may not be something you need to hear right at the moment, if you think that just learning the basic chord shapes is more that enough, but the great thing about the guitar is that you can play the same chords in many different ways, depending on what is important at a particular spot.<\/p>\n<p>So, in the third measure, we define <tt>x20030<\/tt> as a legitimate replacement for <tt>320003<\/tt>.<\/p>\n<p>This gives the following transition between D\/c and G\/b:<\/p>\n<pre class=\"tab\">  x          x\r\n  ======     ======\r\n  ||||||     ||||||\r\n  ------     ------\r\n  |||1||     |1||||\r\n  ------ -&gt;  ------\r\n  |2||3|     ||||3|\r\n  ------     ------\r\n  ||||||     ||||||<\/pre>\n<p>The third objection is actually valid, and it exemplifies the problem of pinning down a set of chords\/sounds to a common symbol &#8212; the chord sign.  I\u2019ll come back to this later when we take a look at &#8220;Boots of Spanish Leather&#8221;, but for now: why should I call the second chord <tt>D\/c<\/tt>?<\/p>\n<p>First of all: it\u2019s a bit cheating. The <tt>c<\/tt> is the seventh tone in the D major scale, and hence the proper name for the chord is <tt>D7\/c<\/tt>. When I don\u2019t write it like that, it\u2019s not just out of laziness, but because even though all the tones of a D7 chord are in there, it doesn\u2019t <em>feel<\/em> or <em>work<\/em> like a seventh chord &#8212; it feels like a static D chord with a descending bass line under it.<\/p>\n<p>For that matter, I could also have called the third chord <tt>D\/b<\/tt>, and that wouldn\u2019t have been all wrong either, although the tone <tt>d<\/tt> is the only tone in there that actually belongs to the D chord.<\/p>\n<p>To test this statement, try to play that whole line with just a D chord all the way through (disregard the bass line for now), and say if that doesn\u2019t actually sound quite right.<\/p>\n<p>The lesson to be learned from this is that a chord name is not just a way to tell you which fingers to put where &#8212; it\u2019s not just a name for a certain finger configuration: it\u2019s also a way to classify according to function. This may go so far that a chord could be called a variant of, say, G, without even containing a <tt>g<\/tt> note.<\/p>\n<p>This is also why, if you leave out the slash part of the chord names above, the second chord will sound wrong. We have defined the descending bass as one of the important elements in that line, and chosen  the chord names accordingly. If we leave out the important part, we may have to find a way to put it back again.<\/p>\n<p>One way could be to play the second chord as a C. That would give us the <tt>\/c<\/tt> in the bass, and it would actually also account for the open first string, which we\u2019ve allowed as &#8220;filler&#8221;, but which really doesn\u2019t belong in the D chord. It does belong in the C chord.<\/p>\n<p>A C there would also go well with the chord that follows: G. Even though C is not the dominant of G but the other way around, there is still enough of a bond between the two chords, that <tt>C  G<\/tt> is a perfectly acceptable progression. (In popular music, that is. In fact, if we add the D to which we\u2019re coming, we have the &#8220;Try with a little help from my friends&#8221; part of the Beatles song. In classical music, that progression is not permitted.)<\/p>\n<p>When I name the chords as I do, it\u2019s by choice: I choose to consider the passage as basically a drawn-out &#8220;D-with-variations&#8221;. The G\/b is partly a concession to chord shapes &#8212; it is actually closer to a G chord than to a D chord &#8212; and partly as a way of acknowledging that there is a certain preparatory character to that third chord, which sets it apart from the other &#8220;D&#8221; chords in that line.<\/p>\n<p>There. Calmer now?<\/p>\n<p>Now, &#8217;nuff talking. Back to rehearsal.<\/p>\n<h3>All the Lessons<\/h3>\n<p>[catlist name=Lessons numberposts=150 order=asc orderby=date excludeposts=419]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s been said about guitar playing that the left hand is the craftsman, but the right hand is the artist. I first read that when I was a kid, struggling with some classical guitar etudes or whatever, and I thought it was a great quote &#8212; only whoever said it must have gotten the hands [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-273","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-lessons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=273"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":593,"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273\/revisions\/593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/oestrem.com\/thingstwice\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}